Thursday's Columns
April 2, 2026
Our
Story
by
Lawrence Abby Gauthier
ace reporter
The Westphalia Periodic News
At every newspaper I ever worked at, there was always some old timer, some old retired reporter (always a guy who walked with a cane) who liked to come around to just hang out at the periphery of the scene, osmotically absorbing the frenetic energy of a newsroom approaching deadline, drinking coffee in his own personal mug, sitting at an empty desk in a corner of the room.
Not just anybody off the street can walk into and hang out in a newsroom — an inner sanctum where confidential information is openly exchanged. But old reporters who’d paid their dues can. Like families, once you’re in, nobody can make you leave.
Sometimes they’d join us after work over a few beers. The editors would typically let them write a personal column now and then. I usually didn’t like them, their columns, I mean, not the old timers.
I liked the old timers. I liked listening to their stories about their adventures chasing Capone and their stories of the homefront when everybody was supporting the country’s war.
But their columns sucked… all about the weather, their gardens, grandchildren, their bum knees. Vietnam was still going on and they’re writing about tulips in their garden on a sunny day.
I told myself that if I ever got to be old and had a column that I wouldn’t write that way.
But dammit, it’s been a horrible winter out here on the western plains of Colorado. Hot and dry. We can’t stay here without water. We’d have to move. The reservoirs are getting dangerously low. Record highs day after day. The weatherlady says she’s never seen anything like it.
I talk to my brothers and sister and folks back in the U.P. — Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, way up north. It’s been a miserable winter up there, too — snow drifted halfway up the telephone poles. Nobody can even get to their ice shacks out on Lake Antoine. Dad’s 98 and mom’s not far behind and they say they’ve never seen anything like it.
In our own backyard, winter’s barely out the door and already rhubarb and dandelions are breaking through the soil.
Never seen anything like it.
And now once again we’re a country at war and this is the homefront where millions are marching in the streets, chanting “No Kings.” Unlike Vietnam, the longhairs in the streets now are grandmothers.
No, in all my years I’ve never seen anything like it.
I wasn’t around for the beheading of Charles I in 1649, or Louis XVI in 1793. Even during Vietnam, everybody had been “Born in the USA” where there hadn’t been a king since 1776.
Like it’s the middle ages again before there were cars and electric motors to mill the harvest of grain into flour and people were ruled by bloodlines and creeds.
So, obviously, I’ve never seen anything like it before, which makes the story breaking news, more interesting, I think, than tulips on a sunny day, or my back after chopping wood.
--30--
Dr. Jerry Gilbert
Clinical Psychologist
(Retired)
Denver

Dr. Jerry
This is the result of my exploring Leibniz:
Since Leibniz uses the concepts of a god and a soul, as an atheist and empiricist I cannot address those parts of his philosophy.
Leibniz is famous for his concept of a Monad, which I find confusing. He calls it the basic substance of the universe, with no reducible parts, but has qualities that undergo change. They don’t interact with each other, and yet he considers a person to be a Monad although it is a complexity of parts. He considers Monads to be substances, yet he claims that space, time, matter, and motion are subjective perceptions or phenomenal. I agree that space, time, and motion are subjective, but isn’t substance equivalent to matter? Although he claimed that everything is reducible to substances, these substances were an active unity endowed with perception and desire.
He writes: “God does not arbitrarily inflict pain and suffering on humans; rather he permits both moral evil (sin) and physical evil (pain and suffering) as the necessary consequences of metaphysical evil (imperfection), as a means by which humans can identify and correct their erroneous decisions, and as a contrast to true good.”
So, he considered this world to be perfect with “apparent flaws” which seem to be products of human failings, and suffering exists to influence people to correct their Evil and do Good. So why would a god create a perfect world which contains beings capable of creating flaws, including Evil?
There are many other examples of his thinking that don’t make sense to me.
Overall, I have found nothing in his philosophy that would help me understand the world or guide me through it. I would welcome your input.
(Our ace reporter responds…)
In his 1920 classic study, “The Idea of Progress,” Cambridge scholar J. B. Bury identifies Leibnitz as the father of that idea, which morphs naturally into Philosophical Optimism.
In “New Essays on Human Understanding,” Leibniz refutes Locke’s empiricism by reminding us that “appearances can be deceiving.” Human history only looks like the cyclical rise and fall of dominant civilizations. Observed in its entirely from higher ground, we discover inexorable progress.
To explain why he thought the way he did, Leibniz invented calculus, a universal language we use to this day. We could not be going back to the moon without it. That’s what I like about Leibniz.
